2024
2023
2021
- Denial of Work-From-Home Requests: A New Era of Discrimination?
- April Showers Bring
- Restrictions on Employee Social Media
- Can Employees Be Forced to Get the Covid-19 Vaccination?
2020
- Holidays...To Pay or Not to Pay, What is Required
- EEOC Update on COVID-19
- Protection of Employee Health Information
- Civil Rights Win for LGBTQ Employees
- OSHA Recordkeeping Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- The Line Between At-Will Termination and Wrongful Termination
- Regulating Firearms in the Workplace
- Social Media Use in Hiring
2019
2018
- What Not to Wear
- Vicarious Liability for Unlawful Harrassment
- Employee Surveillance & Union Formation
- A Lesson in Retaliation
- Employers May Sometimes Judge a Book By Its Cover
- Mind Your P’s and Q’s . . . and BFOQs
- Severance Agreements
- U.S. Department of Labor "Paid" Program
- Revisiting Records Retention
- Calculating the Regular Rate
- Independent Contractor or Employee?
2017
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- DRI Membership: It’s Personal
- Is Extended Leave a Reasonable Accommodation?
- Parental Leave
- Pay Disparity
- Religious accomodation in the workplace
- Equal pay and prior salary information
- I quit! How to avoid constructive discharge
- You Can't Shred Email
- Navigating Unemployment Claims
- Considering Criminal History in Pre-Employment Decisions
- Defamation Claims from Former Employees
- Mixed Motive Causation
2016
- Requesting Accomodation: Kowitz v. Trinity Health
- Antitrust Law in Human Resources
- An Evolving Standard: Joint-Employment
- What Does At-Will Employment Mean for Employers?
- Let's Talk About Wages
- THE FLSA: CHANGES ARE COMING
- Follow Up: Obesity and the ADA
- The Importance of Social Media Policies
- Is Obesity a Qualifying Disability under the ADA?
- Retaliation on the Rise: The EEOC Responds
- What Motivates You?
2015
- "But I thought ...
- Who’s expecting? And what is he expecting?
- Are You Still Doing Annual Performance Reviews?
- Who is Your Employee?
- The unpaid intern trap Part II
- “We’ve been the victim of a cyber-attack”
- So, a Hasidic Jew, a nun in a habit and a woman wearing a headscarf walk into your office?
- The unpaid intern trap
- Pregnancy in the workplace
- Let's talk about honesty.
- "Did You Know" Series - Part I
- Conducting an Internal Investigation
- What HR can look forward to in 2015!
2014
- The chokehold of workplace technology
- Does your company have trade secrets?
- North Dakota Construction Law Compendium for 2014
- Does the North Dakota baby boom affect you?
- Ban the Box? Why?
- The end of the world as we know it
- Everybody has an opinion
- Changes, Changes, Changes!
- Nick Grant presents at North Dakota Safety Council's 41st Annual Safety and Health Conference
- Email impairment: A potentially harmful condition
Mar 26, 2024
On January 10, 2024, the Department of Labor published a final rule on how to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the FLSA, employees are entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, and other benefits that independent contractors are not entitled to. The misclassification of employees as independent contractors may deny workers of the benefits and protections they are entitled to under the FLSA and such misclassification could lead to serious ramifications for employers.
The Department of Labor’s new rule is effective March 11, 2024, and is bringing back the “totality of the circumstances” approach that is consistent with the one federal courts have utilized. The new implements a six-factor test that considers the following for determining employee or independent contractor status:
1) The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;
2) The investments by the worker and the potential employer;
3) The degree of permanence of the work relationship;
4) The nature and degree of control over the work;
5) The extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business; and,
6) The amount of skill and initiative required for the work.
As mentioned above, the analysis under the new rule utilizes a totality of the circumstances approach and the factors do not have a predetermined weight; no one factor is dispositive in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Additional factors may be relevant if they bear on whether the worker is economically dependent on the potential employer for work and, considering the factors as a whole, the worker is not likely to be an independent contractor if the worker is economically dependent on an employer for work.
The new rule is significantly more “employee friendly” than the previous rule, which only had a five-factor test and put more weight on the nature and degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. Despite the Department of Labor’s belief that the new rule will provide clarity and consistency in classifying workers, it could potentially do the opposite and making classification more difficult due to there being more factors to consider and none of them being more determinative than others of a worker’s status. Businesses, specifically those that rely on the use of independent contractors, carry the risk of increased misclassification under the new rule.
The Takeaway:
The Department of Labor’s new rule in determining employee or independent contractor status carries the risk of increased misclassification. Businesses should evaluate their current independent contractors, as well as future independent contractors, to ensure that they are properly classified under the factors of the new rule. The misclassification of employees as independent contractors may deny workers of the benefits and protections they are entitled to under the FLSA and such misclassification could lead to serious ramifications for businesses, such as potential litigation to have independent contractors reclassified as employees and for the award of damages for pay that a worker would have received had they been properly classified as employees. To ensure that workers are being properly classified, employers are well-advised to seek the help of legal counsel.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at mcerkoney@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the March, 2024 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.
Final Rule on Independent Contractor Classification
By: Marissa CerkoneyOn January 10, 2024, the Department of Labor published a final rule on how to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the FLSA, employees are entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, and other benefits that independent contractors are not entitled to. The misclassification of employees as independent contractors may deny workers of the benefits and protections they are entitled to under the FLSA and such misclassification could lead to serious ramifications for employers.
The Department of Labor’s new rule is effective March 11, 2024, and is bringing back the “totality of the circumstances” approach that is consistent with the one federal courts have utilized. The new implements a six-factor test that considers the following for determining employee or independent contractor status:
1) The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;
2) The investments by the worker and the potential employer;
3) The degree of permanence of the work relationship;
4) The nature and degree of control over the work;
5) The extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business; and,
6) The amount of skill and initiative required for the work.
As mentioned above, the analysis under the new rule utilizes a totality of the circumstances approach and the factors do not have a predetermined weight; no one factor is dispositive in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. Additional factors may be relevant if they bear on whether the worker is economically dependent on the potential employer for work and, considering the factors as a whole, the worker is not likely to be an independent contractor if the worker is economically dependent on an employer for work.
The new rule is significantly more “employee friendly” than the previous rule, which only had a five-factor test and put more weight on the nature and degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss. Despite the Department of Labor’s belief that the new rule will provide clarity and consistency in classifying workers, it could potentially do the opposite and making classification more difficult due to there being more factors to consider and none of them being more determinative than others of a worker’s status. Businesses, specifically those that rely on the use of independent contractors, carry the risk of increased misclassification under the new rule.
The Takeaway:
The Department of Labor’s new rule in determining employee or independent contractor status carries the risk of increased misclassification. Businesses should evaluate their current independent contractors, as well as future independent contractors, to ensure that they are properly classified under the factors of the new rule. The misclassification of employees as independent contractors may deny workers of the benefits and protections they are entitled to under the FLSA and such misclassification could lead to serious ramifications for businesses, such as potential litigation to have independent contractors reclassified as employees and for the award of damages for pay that a worker would have received had they been properly classified as employees. To ensure that workers are being properly classified, employers are well-advised to seek the help of legal counsel.
Our Interest in Serving You:
My law firm’s goal is to give understandable information and to foster discussion about real-life issues facing human resource professionals. If we are not achieving that goal or if you would like us to address other employment law issues, please email me at mcerkoney@ndlaw.com. We promise to take your comments and ideas to heart.
Disclaimers
(Otherwise known as “the fine print”)
I make a serious effort to be accurate in my writings. These articles are not exhaustive treatises, though, so do not consider them complete or authoritative. Providing this information to you does not create an attorney-client relationship with my firm or me. Do not act upon the contents of this or of any article on our homepage or consider it a replacement for professional advice.
Reprinted with permission from an article submitted for publication in the March, 2024 Southwest Area Human Resource Association newsletter.